
from gizmodo
Yesterday, the International Herald Tribune ran an article on the iSlate, the rumored Apple tablet, that essentially says that the iSlate will be a game-changer. Although the author acknowledges in the first few paragraphs that what little we know about it comes from various blogs, she writes the rest of the article with such authoritative certainty about the iSlate and its capabilities.
“Like many new digital devices, it will combine several products in one,” she states. “Critically it will also act as an electronic reader, like Amazon’s Kindle and Sony’s Reader.” She asserts that the iSlate will revolutionize e-media — just as the iPod revolutionized digital media — and that it will come with “a fun, simple system with which we can download e-content.”
All of this is certainly plausible, but herein lies the problem: we don’t actually know anything about the Apple tablet. Most of the information available about the tablet, including its presumptive name, comes from blogs and rumor mills. Some of the hearsay has been given credence because their sources have been correct (or lucky) in the past. Other pieces of gossip have gotten a life of their own simply because they struck a chord and captured the imagination. Slowly, these spread across the blogosphere, gaining legitimacy with each reblog or retweet until they coalesced into conventional wisdom. As such, what began as rumors and hype in the far-flung corners of the Internet have now infected even the titans of traditional journalism.
Read more